2009 Legislative Changes to the Florida Probate Code (Part 2)

In my previous post, I discussed some of the minor changes to the Florida Probate Code enacted by the Legislature this year. In this post, I will discuss one of the major changes, and that is to the Elective Share rules. The Elective Share rules are based upon the old English common law rules of dower and curtesy. In short, the rules provide that if you are married, you are not allowed to disinherit your spouse. If you leave your spouse out of your will and give everything to your children or your mistress, or, if you leave your husband something but he is unhappy with it, then in Florida the surviving spouse has the right to take what's known as an elective share. When people first hear about this they are often outraged. "It's my money and I should be able to leave it to whoever I want to!" they say. But the legislature decided that the state has a fundamental interest in protecting poor old widows (and in rarer cases widowers) from being kicked out on the street by the vengeful children of their recently deceased spouse (this is also the reason behind the Homestead rules of devise and decent.)

The amount of the elective share is 30%. Not too long ago it was fairly easy for estate planners to avoid the elective share by certain transfers, life insurance purchases, and pay on death accounts, so that the deceased spouse did not own any property that would be subject to the elective estate upon their death. Then, the Florida legislature changed the rules to create what is known as the "elective estate." The elective estate includes the decedent's probate estate, interest in transfer on death accounts, the cash surrender value of his life insurance, and even property given away by him during the one year period preceding his death.

Once the elective share is determined, by adding up all of the property comprising the elective estate (and subtracting any allowable deductions), the surviving spouse is entitled to 30% of that. But the next question is how is that paid? If the elective estate is comprised of life insurance going to Son A and an IRA account where daughter B is the beneficiary, and property given to C before the decedent died, how is the elective share satisfied? Or to put it in laymen's terms "who get's screwed?"

The Legislature substantially amended Section 732.2075, "Sources from which elective share payable; abatement" by providing that if certain property passing to the surviving spouse automatically does not satisfy the elective share, then the unsatisfied balance shall be "allocated entirely to one class of direct recipients of the remaining elective estate and apportioned among those recipients, and if the elective share amount is not fully satisified, to the next class of direct recipients," in a certain order, until the elective share is satisfied.

In the next post, I will discuss the various classes from which the elective share is satisfied, and the new rules regarding disclaimers.

2009 Legislative Changes to the Florida Probate Code (Part 1)

The Florida Legislature has made a number of tweaks, some major, mostly minor, to the Florida Probate Code in 2009.  My summary of the minor revisions are below. The statute went into effect on July 1, 2009. First, the minor changes.

  1. In Section 731.201, the term "Incompetent" has been changed to "Incapacitated" (and the definition revised) and the term "Minor" has been added.  Additionally, whenever "incompetent" previously appeared in the Code, that term has been changed to incapacitated. 
  2. Section 732.108 had been clarified to provide that Chapter 95 concerning adverse possession and the limitation of the claims of certain heirs in an adverse possession case, is not applicable with regards to determining whether a child born out of wedlock can inherit from its father or father's relatives.
  3. Section 735.203 is amended to provide that when filing a Petition for Summary Administration (which is an abbreviated probate process for estates that are worth less than $75,000), if the Trustee of a Trust that is a beneficiary of the estate signs on to the Petition, then each Qualified Beneficiary of the Trust shall be served formal notice of the petition, unless joinder or consent is obtained from the Beneficiary..  This is actually an important provision.  Some courts, before issuing an order of summary administration were requiring the consent of all qualified beneficiaries, and some were not.  This amendment clarifies that if the Trustee/Petitioner is unable to obtain all of the Qualified Beneficiaries of the Trust, then it may serve them Formal Notice instead.
  4.  Section 736.0802 is amended to impose stricter rules on what type of investments a Trustee may make, and whose consent it must receive before doing so. 

But the two major changes to the law involve the elective share and disclaimers, which I shall discuss in my next post.

Link to Original Legislation